Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Noam Chomsky: No Evidence that Al-Qaeda Carried Out the 9/11 Attacks

  1. #1
    Contributing Sr. Mod
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    6,238
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    35

    Lightbulb Noam Chomsky: No Evidence that Al-Qaeda Carried Out the 9/11 Attacks

    The Anniversary of 9/11



    Don't want to hear this?

    Tough. Grow up.

    9/11 Commissioners:
















    • And the Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) - who led the 9/11 staff's inquiry - recently said "At some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened". He also said "I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described .... The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years.... This is not spin. This is not true." And he said: "It's almost a culture of concealment, for lack of a better word. There were interviews made at the FAA's New York center the night of 9/11 and those tapes were destroyed. The CIA tapes of the interrogations were destroyed. The story of 9/11 itself, to put it mildly, was distorted and was completely different from the way things happened"

    If even the 9/11 Commissioners don't buy the official story, why do you?

    Senior intelligence officers:

    • Former military analyst and famed whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg said that the case of a certain 9/11 whistleblower is "far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers". He also said that the government is ordering the media to cover up her allegations about 9/11. And he said that some of the claims concerning government involvement in 9/11 are credible, that "very serious questions have been raised about what they [U.S. government officials] knew beforehand and how much involvement there might have been", that engineering 9/11 would not be humanly or psychologically beyond the scope of the current administration, and that there's enough evidence to justify a new, "hard-hitting" investigation into 9/11 with subpoenas and testimony taken under oath (see this and this)








    • A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called "perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the Middle East”, and whose astounding career formed the script for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana (Robert Baer) said that "the evidence points at" 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job



    If even our country's top intelligence officers don't buy the official story, why do you?

    Congressmen:


















    • Former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee Curt Weldon has shown that the U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job

    If there is bipartisan questioning of the official story, why aren't you questioning it?

    Other government officials:



    • Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter (Morton Goulder), former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US Department of State Foreign Service Officer (J. Michael Springmann), as well as a who's who of liberals and independents) jointly call for a new investigation into 9/11


    • Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus) says "The information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defense of incompetence"









    If top government officials are skeptical, why aren't you?

    Numerous other politicians, judges, legal scholars, and attorneys also question at least some aspects of the government's version of 9/11.



    Washington’s Blog
    November 6, 2010




    Leading liberal intellectual Noam Chomsky just told Press TV:



    “The explicit and declared motive of the [Afghanistan] war was to compel the Taliban to turn over to the United States, the people who they accused of having been involved in World Trade Center and Pentagon terrorist acts. The Taliban…they requested evidence…and the Bush administration refused to provide any,” the 81-year-old senior academic made the remarks on Press TV’s program a Simple Question.


    “We later discovered one of the reasons why they did not bring evidence: they did not have any.”


    The political analyst also said that nonexistence of such evidence was confirmed by FBI eight months later.


    “The head of FBI, after the most intense international investigation in history, informed the press that the FBI believed that the plot may have been hatched in Afghanistan, but was probably implemented in the United Arab Emirates and Germany.”



    Chomsky added that three weeks into the war, “a British officer announced that the US and Britain would continue bombing, until the people of Afghanistan overthrew the Taliban… That was later turned into the official justification for the war.”


    “All of this was totally illegal. It was more, criminal,” Chomsky said.
    As Wired wrote on September 27, 2001:
    President Bush has said he has evidence that Osama bin Laden was behind the attacks, so it would seem obvious that the FBI would include him and other suspects on its 10 most wanted fugitives Web page.
    Think again.
    Bin Laden is listed, but only for the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya. There is no mention of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing or the attacks on the USS Cole in October 2000, both of which he is widely believed to have orchestrated. And forget about Sept. 11.


    The reason? Fugitives on the list must be formally charged with a crime, and bin Laden is still only a suspect in the recent attacks in New York City and Washington.


    “There’s going to be a considerable amount of time before anyone associated with the attacks is actually charged,” said Rex Tomb, who is head of the FBI’s chief fugitive publicity unit and helps decide which fugitives appear on the list. “To be charged with a crime, this means we have found evidence to confirm our suspicions, and a prosecutor has said we will pursue this case in court.”


    Larry C. Johnson, a former CIA officer who was deputy director of the U.S. State Department Office of Counterterrorism from 1989 to 1993, said in a Sept. 12 interview conducted by Frontline that there is no concrete proof that bin Laden is responsible for the USS Cole and the 1993 WTC attacks, but bin Laden celebrates those attacks and associates himself with people who are responsible for it.
    President Bush promises to reveal evidence linking bin Laden to the suicide hijackers who attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Bin Laden has applauded the attacks but denies direct involvement.
    • A d v e r t i s e m e n t
    • The Bush administration never provided such evidence.As I wrote last December:

    President Obama said Tuesday night as justification for the surge in troops in Afghanistan:
    We did not ask for this fight. On September 11, 2001, 19 men hijacked four airplanes and used them to murder nearly 3,000 people.
    Al Qaeda’s base of operations was in Afghanistan, where they were harbored by the Taliban”, who refused to turn over Osama bin Laden.
    Is that true?
    On October 14, 2001, the Taliban offered to hand over Osama bin Laden to a neutral country if the US halted bombing if the Taliban were given evidence of Bin Laden’s involvement in 9/11.
    Specifically, as the Guardian writes:
    Returning to the White House after a weekend at Camp David, the president said the bombing would not stop, unless the ruling Taliban “turn [bin Laden] over, turn his cohorts over, turn any hostages they hold over.” He added, “There’s no need to discuss innocence or guilt. We know he’s guilty” …
    Afghanistan’s deputy prime minister, Haji Abdul Kabir, told reporters that the Taliban would require evidence that Bin Laden was behind the September 11 terrorist attacks in the US.
    “If the Taliban is given evidence that Osama bin Laden is involved” and the bombing campaign stopped, “we would be ready to hand him over to a third country”, Mr Kabir added.
    However, as the Guardian subsequently points out:
    A senior Taliban minister has offered a last-minute deal to hand over Osama bin Laden during a secret visit to Islamabad, senior sources in Pakistan told the Guardian last night.
    For the first time, the Taliban offered to hand over Bin Laden for trial in a country other than the US without asking to see evidence first in return for a halt to the bombing, a source close to Pakistan’s military leadership said.
    And yet … the U.S. turned down the offer and instead prosecuted war.
    And in 2006, FBI agent Rex Tomb told reporter Ed Haas that the FBI still did not have enough evidence:
    The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.

    In fact, many leading liberals have expressed doubts about 9/11, including Daniel Ellsberg, Ray McGovern, William Blum, Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel, Lewis Lapham, Dan Hamburg, Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan, Amy Goodman, Thom Hartmann, Rabbi Michael Lerner, Marc Crispin Miller, Howard Zinn, Robert McChesney, Gore Vidal, Chris Floyd, Robert Fisk, Medea Benjamin, Doris “Granny D” Haddock, Paul Hawken, David Cobb, Randy Hayes, Ernest Callenbach, Dennis Bernstein, Paul H. Ray, Michael Franti, Janeane Garafalo and Ed Asner.

  2. #2
    Astragoth
    Unregistered Guest

    Default

    I doubt I'd trust Noam Chomsky if he told me the sky is blue but he's right on this one.


Similar Threads

  1. U.S. Government Backs Libyan Al-Qaeda While Hyping Terror Attacks Inside U.S.
    By FL Patriot in forum American News For White America
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-21-2011, 12:24 AM
  2. The American Military now KNOWS Mossad carried out 9/11 Attacks
    By Keltoi in forum 9/11 Was An Inside Job
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-18-2010, 11:14 PM
  3. al-Qaeda Planning Attacks Using Females With Breast Implant Bombs
    By Davy Crockett in forum British News For Britons
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-03-2010, 10:20 PM
  4. Noam Chomsky Says Media is Blacking Out Effort to Aid Gaza
    By Silver Stallion in forum Mideast & Central Asia News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-04-2010, 10:41 PM
  5. NOAM CHOMSKY ~~ DILETTANTE EXTRAORDINAIRE
    By FL Patriot in forum American News For White America
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-14-2009, 01:48 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •